Home
  English
  Arabic
  Russian
  Chinese
Help the victims of war: make a donation to the ICRC today!
section_ihl_occupied_territory

News
Only press releases older than one year exist for this section.

Section
Occupied territory - the legal issues
References to key legal provisions regarding the occupation of territory by a hostile power, and the implications for people protected by international humanitarian law.
©ICRC/C. Appel/ref. il-e-00138
Israel/OT/AT - West Bank - 2003

Territory is considered "occupied" when it is actually placed under the authority of foreign armed forces, whether partially or entirely, without the consent of the domestic government. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.

International humanitarian law (IHL) applies in all situations where these requirements are fulfilled, regardless of the reasons and motives that lead to the occupation (e.g. stated intention to "liberate" the people of a country) and regardless of its legality under international law.

The primary sources of the modern law of occupation are the Hague Regulations of 1907, the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 and certain provisions of the First Protocol of 1977 Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.

Legal basis

  • Hague Convention IV of 1907 covering the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, articles 42 to 56)

  • The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949

  • Protocol 1 of 1977, additional to the Geneva Conventions articles 63, 68, 69 and 71

  • A situation of occupation confers both rights and obligations on an occupying power. However, while a situation of occupation may in fact prevent a government from exercising sovereignty over part or all of its territory, this does not confer sovereign rights on the occupant. Occupation is by definition a temporary situation that interferes with, but does not diminish or terminate, the sovereign rights of the people under occupation.

    Once an occupant has established effective control over a territory it must, as far as possible, restore and maintain public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the occupied territory.

    In addition to the rules found in international humanitarian law, the occupying power must respect human rights law and national law, subject to certain exceptions.

    See also:

    Civilians in the power of the enemy and international humanitarian law

    Key document
    International Review of the Red Cross
      30-9-2008
      The interrelation of the law of occupation and economic, social and cultural rights: the examples of food, health and property
      The current legal regime relative to occupation is no longer based solely on customary law and treaty-based law as set forth in the law of The Hague and the law of Geneva. The article explores how this regime has undergone a thorough change with the progressive recognition of the applicability of human rights law to the situations that it governs. The author examines the interrelation of international humanitarian law and human rights at the level of their individual rules, and considers whether the rules of international humanitarian law are confirmed, complemented, relativized or even contradicted by those deriving from human rights.
      (Info resources\International Review\2008 - No. 871)
      International Review of the Red CrossSylvain Vité Includes PDF

      30-9-2008
      The law of military occupation put to the test of human rights law
      This article outlines the debate on the general relationship between the law of armed conflicts and human rights and examines particularly the applicability of human rights during military occupation. Complementarity and compatibility should be evaluated case by case, on the basis of the rules making up each of these regimes and any exceptions that these rules contain. The different interests and values at stake – the interests of the occupying forces and those of the civilian population, the protection of human rights and the derogations necessary to maintain order – reveal many grey areas that still exist in the interaction between human rights law and the law of military occupation.
      (Info resources\International Review\2008 - No. 871)
      International Review of the Red CrossDanio Campanelli Includes PDF

      31-3-2008
      Occupation in Iraq since 2003 and the powers of the UN Security Council
      This article provides a summary analysis of the topical question as to how far the Security Council may derogate from occupation law. The answer is that the Council may not derogate from those provisions of IHL that are of a specifically humanitarian nature (humanitarian ordre public), that derogations from international law or IHL are in any case not to be presumed, and that the Council has not derogated in any way from occupation law in the case of the Iraqi occupation since 2003.
      (Info resources\International Review\2008 - No. 869)
      International Review of the Red CrossRobert Kolb Includes PDF

      31-12-2006
      The right to life in armed conflict: does international humanitarian law provide all the answers?
      This article describes the relevant interpretation of the right to life by human rights treaty bodies and analyses how this might influence the law relating to the use of force in armed conflicts and occupations where international humanitarian law is unclear.
      (Info resources\International Review\2006 - No. 864)
      International Review of the Red CrossLouise Doswald-Beck Includes PDF

      31-12-2004
      Existentialism in Iraq: Security Council Resolution 1483 and the law of occupation
      (Info resources\International Review\2004 - No. 856)
      International Review of the Red CrossMarten Zwanenburg Includes PDF

      International Review of the Red CrossRoland Otto Includes PDF

      31-3-2004
      Applicability of the international law of military occupation to the activities of international organizations
      In this article the author points out the similarity between military occupations and certain activities by international organizations. It therefore examines the question whether the international of law of occupation is applicable and if so, adequately, to these activities, and more specifically to international transitional civil administrations. The experiences in Kosovo and East-Timor serve as examples and may lead to some important lessons for dealing with the current situation in Iraq.
      (Info resources\International Review\2004 - No. 853)
      International Review of the Red CrossSylvain Vité Includes PDF

      International Review of the Red Cross

    Official Statement
      21-11-2005
      Current challenges to the law of occupation
      Speech delivered by Professor Daniel Thürer, Member, International Committee of the Red Cross, 6th Bruges Colloquium, 20-21 October 2005
      (Humanitarian law\Other issues\Occupied territory)
      Official Statement

    Report
    More in this section


    go to top of page
    © 2009  International Committee of the Red Cross
    22-11-2009