Ukraine: How a frontline changed two towns
This is the story of two towns caught in the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine. It’s the story of people who still live there, and how shifting frontlines have made access to water, electricity, gas and livelihoods harder.
Valentyna Nazaruk sitting in front of the dry well at her home in Sukha Kamianka.
Sukha Kamianka
The name of Valentyna Nazaruk’s village means ‘dry river’.
The small waterway that divides Sukha Kamianka in the Kharkiv Region of Ukraine doesn’t always flow. Valentyna blames the beavers.
“They constantly block the river with trees and branches, pile up mounds of earth,” she tells us. “They have whole lakes along the river. No one bothers them. You can’t complain to them. You can’t take them to court.”
She is only partly joking. Water is an issue, but it’s not all the fault of beavers upstream.
The frontline of the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine passed through Valentyna’s village more than once in 2022. “My nerves are still not OK,” she says. “It was the scariest thing.”
The consequences of the conflict are stark.
Valentyna lives without regular access to electricity, water or gas. Her house has been destroyed and rebuilt. For a livelihood, her daughter keeps bees to sell honey. They have a greenhouse but rely on rainwater for the crop. Their village was home to 80 people, now just four.
Surrounding fields are littered with unexploded ordnance.
Everything has changed. People live, so to speak, one day at a time.
Valentyna's daughter keeps bees to sell honey.
Armed conflict leaves both visible and hidden scars on the land, impacting the interconnected natural resources and human systems that people living there rely on.
Groundwater sources and water piping can be damaged; fields and forests can be contaminated by explosive hazards, making them inaccessible for livelihoods or sourcing firewood; electrical wires and gas pipes can be cut.
All of this makes life harder for people, especially those who live close to the frontlines.
Valentyna has lived in the area for more than 50 years. “Once upon a time, the household was large,” she tells us. “We had cows, calves, geese, turkeys, chickens and ducks. We had everything. We preserved food for the winter. We never went hungry. But there was a lot of work.” Everyone was lost or destroyed in the fighting.
Now, it’s just Valentyna and her daughter, as well as their dog, Borka, and two black cats.
They have a well with no water. “For two months now,” Valentyna says. In the ruins of a house across the village, there is another well that still works. They pump water from it, using a wheelbarrow to transport it back home.
Availability of water from the river, also polluted by the fighting, depends on increasingly dry and unpredictable seasons – and the beavers. Open plastic containers line the entrance to their house, just in case it rains.
Containers to collect rainwater outside Valentyna's house.
Valentyna has lived without regular access to electricity since 2022. Electricity poles and wires were destroyed in the fighting. She and her daughter make do with batteries, flashlights and solar panels.
But batteries need to be replaced and are expensive, while solar panels can be difficult to maintain. Valentyna tells us they go to bed at 9pm and wake up when it’s light.
“At first, it was difficult without electricity, as we were used to having light and everything working. When it went out, we walked around in the dark with candles, but they left soot and the house was black,” she says.
“That’s how we live, and I’ve gotten used to it. But we’re waiting for something better.”
Damaged electricity poles in Sukha Kamianka.
Bomb disposal experts have combed through the area, finding unexploded shells and other ordnance. Many that hadn’t been found exploded during a wildfire last year.
But most of the surrounding fields still haven’t been checked. “Nothing is sown or planted there,” says Valentyna. White ribbons line the roads outside her village, marking the fields as not safe.
She and her daughter hear drones fly overhead regularly. “They buzz and whir, but we are already used to them,” Valentyna says. “When I see them, I think: ‘I hope it falls somewhere in the field, not near people’.”
Sometimes, Valentyna considers leaving – but doesn’t think that she will.
“You know,” she says, “we are getting used to this.”
A white ribbon warns that fields outside Sukha Kamianka are contaminated with explosive hazards.
Anatolii Kniaziev at his family farm in Dovhenke.
Dovhenke
Not far down the road from Sukha Kamianka is the village of Dovhenke.
Before the escalation of armed conflict, it had three shops, a hospital, pharmacy, village council and a new club that had just been rebuilt. There was electricity, gas, water and internet.
Then, in 2022, the frontline didn’t just pass over the village, “the village was a frontline,” says Nataliia Kniazieva.
“Everything was destroyed,” says Nataliia’s husband, Anatolii. “Now there is nothing”.
Nataliia and Anatolii live and work on a farm in Dovhenke that goes back generations in his family. Their son, Ihor, works with them.
Nataliia and Anatolii's son Ihor in the family farm in Dovhenke.
In 2022, their house was flattened – not a wall left standing. Their farming equipment was destroyed. They were cut off from regular access to water, gas and electricity.
Everyone fled here. Cattle were walking around – herds, without any owners… Cows were even blown up by mines.
Anatolii had a herd of more than 50 sheep. He stayed to care for them, for as long as he could, living in the cellar of their ruined home.
“It was under the house,” he says. “When it rained, it leaked a little, and we put a basin under it to stop it from flowing.”
He lived in the cellar for months, waiting for breaks in the fighting to care for his sheep. He would run out to give them food or water when the shooting stopped, then run back to the cellar when it started again.
If shooting started while he was outside, “I would drop down beside a wall,” he says. None of his sheep remain.
Since the frontline moved on from Dovhenke, only a few dozen from the hundreds of people who used to live there have returned.
Anatolii and Ihor rebuilt their home from scratch. “From whatever we had,” Anatolii says. Empty ammunition boxes littered the area – and were turned into the walls of the new house.
They found an old stove and built a system of heating pipes using discarded artillery shell casings. Destroyed tanks provided wheels for new farming equipment. Craters mark the earth around their new home.
The frontlines also left a hazardous legacy. Much of the village and surrounding fields were contaminated by explosive remnants of the conflict.
“There are thousands of shells,” Anatolii says.
The road leading to Dovhenke, and the streets within it, are lined with small red and white plastic markers, bearing a skull and crossbones, warning of explosive hazards.
In harsh winters without gas or electricity for heating, firewood can be a life-saving alternative fuel source. But these hazards make collecting firewood from surrounding forests “impossible,” Anatolii tells us.
Efforts to clear the hazards are slow. The process is complex and dangerous. There is simply too much ground to cover.
But farmers need the land to live and Ihor, seeking to clear the fields behind their house, narrowly avoided harm when the tractor he was riding set off an explosion. The tractor caught the worst of it. Not everyone is so lucky.
Dovhenke went without electricity from 2022 until last year, when new poles were installed.
Before that, Nataliia and Anatolii were given a small solar panel, which they used to charge their phones. They were given a generator to run a concrete mixer. But they used it sparingly. “Fuel is expensive,” says Anatolii.
Nataliia and Anatolii received a greenhouse and drip irrigation system from the ICRC.
The other issue is water. Limited access to electricity made pumping water difficult. Nataliia and Anatolii dug a 14-meter-deep well that worked fine at first. “But this year, drought – no snow or rain,” Anatolii says.
They rely on wells at other sites in the town, or travel five kilometres to a pumping station, and sometimes receive bottled water.
To help with farming when water and unpredictable seasons pose a challenge, Nataliia and Anatolii were given a greenhouse and drip-irrigation system. “A greenhouse is good,” says Nataliia, “if only there was more water.”
Despite what has been lost, Nataliia and Anatolii are proud of what they have rebuilt.
With the help of the drip irrigation system, their greenhouse is overflowing with kiwis and avocadoes, tomatoes and cucumbers. They’ve already harvested cabbage, onion and garlic.
We overhear Ihor refer to his mum as the boss. “Yes,” Nataliia confirms. “I am the boss of the greenhouse. The garden is mine.”
In times like these, even the smallest possessions can mean the world.
The frontline is still just under 30 kilometres away.
Nataliia leads a tour of her greenhouse in Dovhenke.
Read more about our work in Ukraine
- Ukraine: Strikes on cities are upending lives
- Ukraine: DNA and Dignity for the Deceased
- ICRC’s Central Tracing Agency Bureau for the International Armed Conflict between the Russian Federation and Ukraine: Providing answers to families
- Russia–Ukraine international armed conflict: Your questions answered about the ICRC’s work
- Useful information for people affected by the international armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine